<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="EN">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="aggregator">75011008</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Film Education Journal</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">2515-7086</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">2515-7086</issn>
<publisher>
        <publisher-name>UCL IOE Press</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
</journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18546/FEJ.01.1.05</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="sici">2515-7086(20180618)1:1L.51;1-</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">s5.phd</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="other">/ioep/fej/2018/00000001/00000001/art00005</article-id>
<article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Articles</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
<title-group>
        <article-title>Reflections on<italic> The Cinema Hypothesis</italic>: A response to Alain Bergala</article-title>
      </title-group>
<contrib-group>
        <contrib xlink:type="simple">
          <name>
<surname>Burn</surname>
<given-names>Andrew</given-names>
</name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
<pub-date pub-type="created">
        <day>18</day>
        <month>06</month>
        <year>2018</year>
      </pub-date>
<volume>1</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>51</fpage>
<lpage>63</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-year>2018</copyright-year>
</permissions>
<self-uri content-type="journal-page" xlink:href="www.uclpress.co.uk/pages/film-education-journal"/>
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      <abstract>
        <p>This article engages in debate with Alain Bergala's<italic> The Cinema Hypothesis</italic>. It selects four topics for discussion. The article agrees with Bergala's arguments for the importance of (film) art in education as a productively subversive practice, and that engagement with film should
 be a creative process, in the viewing and interpretation of film as well as in film-making. It disputes Bergala's opposition to language-isms, arguing for the value of multimodal semiotics as a way for students to understand the structures of the moving image. It also disputes Bergala's efforts
 to insulate film from other media, arguing that, in a world of proliferating transmedia narrative, educators and students benefit from exploring representations and structures between and across media.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>FILM EDUCATION</kwd>
        <kwd>MEDIA EDUCATION</kwd>
        <kwd>MULTIMODALITY</kwd>
        <kwd>SEMIOTICS</kwd>
        <kwd>MEDIA LITERACY</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
</article>
