Research article

Nurturing environmental awareness: how high school students in Johannesburg are shaping a greener future

Authors
  • Shorai Prisca Parayiwa (Department of Science and Technology Education, College of Education, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa)
  • Nonkanyiso Pamella Shabalala orcid logo (Department of Science and Technology Education, College of Education, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa)

Abstract

This study explores the extent of environmental awareness and eco-friendly practices among high school students in the Johannesburg Central District, South Africa. The study adopted a qualitative research approach, case study design where four schools were classified as cases, and it purposively sampled 26 Grade 11 and 24 Grade 8 high school students. Using qualitative methods such as interviews, observations and questionnaires, the research focuses on key environmental activities, including waste management, energy conservation and participation in environmental projects. The findings reveal differing levels of engagement with sustainable practices across different schools, with some schools demonstrating more inclusive environmental initiatives. Students showed a strong understanding of how waste reduction, recycling and energy conservation contribute to climate change mitigation. However, challenges were noted between knowledge and long-term behavioural changes. The study emphasises the important role that experiential learning plays in environmental education. Through participation in hands-on activities such as school gardening and recycling projects, students not only acquire environmental knowledge but also develop a deeper sense of environmental stewardship. The study calls for increased integration of environmental education into school curricula, with an emphasis on the concept of climate change and greater community involvement to promote sustainable behaviours. The research further advocates the need for schools to become central agents of environmental change, empowering students to take on active roles as environmental stewards. This research aims to guide teachers and policymakers in enhancing environmental education to foster a more environmentally responsible future generation.

Keywords: sustainability, environmental education, environmental awareness, recycling, experiential learning

How to Cite: Parayiwa, S.P. and Shabalala, N.P. (2025) ‘Nurturing environmental awareness: how high school students in Johannesburg are shaping a greener future’. International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning, 17 (1), 22–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/IJDEGL.17.1.02.

Rights: 2025, Shorai Prisca Parayiwa and Nonkanyiso Pamella Shabalala.

4774 Views

286 Downloads

Published on
25 Jun 2025
Peer Reviewed

Background to the study

Environmental challenges such as climate change, deforestation, water scarcity and urban pollution have become pressing global issues, threatening ecosystems and human livelihoods. These challenges are particularly acute in urban areas such as Johannesburg, South Africa, where rapid urbanisation worsens environmental pressures (Mashaba et al., 2022). Addressing these challenges requires promoting environmental awareness and action-oriented behaviours, particularly among younger generations. Given the importance of environmental stewardship in addressing pressing environmental challenges, this study seeks to explore the levels of environmental awareness and practices among high school students in the Johannesburg Central District. As foundational institutions for learning and social change, schools are uniquely positioned to promote environmental education and equip students with the skills and knowledge necessary to address environmental concerns.

Environmental education is increasingly recognised as a tool for addressing global environmental challenges, particularly in urban areas. Nyika and Mwema (2021) state that environmental education equips students with knowledge, skills and values to resolve environmental issues and promotes action-oriented behaviours. In urban settings, environmental education programmes have shown positive impacts, including increased green areas, environmental consciousness and community well-being (Vieira et al., 2022). These programmes are especially important as urbanisation intensifies environmental pressures, leading to issues such as urban sprawl, pollution and loss of biodiversity (Halliday, 2006). However, environmental education faces challenges, including limited resources and poor knowledge transformation into practice (Nyika and Mwema, 2021). To maximise its effectiveness, environmental education has been integrated into school curricula. It should also involve the community at large and use multidisciplinary approaches (Nyika and Mwema, 2021; Vieira et al., 2022). Globally, environmental education has been recognised as a cornerstone of sustainable development, encouraging individuals to adopt pro-environmental attitudes and practices (Stevenson et al., 2012).

In South Africa, the integration of environmental education into the national Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement reflects a commitment to environmental stewardship. However, challenges persist in translating policy into impactful practices, particularly in urban schools where resource constraints and competing priorities hinder effective implementation (Manaka and Maile, 2021). Johannesburg, as a microcosm of South Africa’s environmental and urban challenges, provides an ideal setting for exploring the role of environmental education in promoting environmental awareness. The city faces significant issues, including waste mismanagement, water scarcity and energy shortages, which stresses the need for localised educational interventions (Mashaba et al., 2022). Schools in Johannesburg are increasingly integrating environmental projects, such as recycling and gardening programmes, to bridge the gap between policy and practice (Mathee and Byrne, 1996). These practices not only strengthen students’ knowledge; they also cultivate a sense of responsibility and active participation in sustainability efforts.

Civil society organisations contribute significantly to environmental education implementation by equipping students with sustainability skills and supporting teachers’ professional development (Damoah and Adu, 2022). A study by Bergman (2016) has shown that environmental education programmes can increase students’ awareness of their potential to impact nature, although changes in environmental appreciation and behavioural intentions may be limited. The effectiveness of environmental education in promoting sustainable living among secondary school students has been explored using sustainable indicators, revealing initial knowledge gaps, but confirming that environmental education programmes can promote sustainability behaviours (Mbokazi et al., 2021). Despite these efforts, challenges remain in bridging the gap between classroom learning and daily environmental practices, foregrounding the need for continued focus on localised educational interventions.

This study explores the environmental awareness and sustainable practices among high school students in Johannesburg. It aims to understand how environmental education contributes to developing knowledge, attitudes and behaviours that promote environmental sustainability. The findings of the study might contribute to the broader discourse on the role of environmental education in addressing environmental challenges and inform strategies for enhancing its implementation in South African schools.

Literature review

Environmental awareness involves understanding the importance of protecting the natural environment while acquiring the knowledge, attitudes and skills necessary for environmental conservation (Sahidullah, 2022). As a foundational element of global sustainability efforts, it ensures the safeguarding of environmental balance and human well-being (Mahirah et al., 2020). Since the 2000s, emphasis has been placed on promoting environmentally aware citizens at all levels of society, acknowledging the role that environmental awareness plays in sustainable development. As previously mentioned, central to this effort is environmental education, which has emerged as a cornerstone of global and national strategies, fosters environmental consciousness and promotes sustainable behaviours (Eten, 2015; Stevenson et al., 2012).

Globally, the International Handbook of Research on Environmental Education identifies environmental education as important in cultivating pro-environmental attitudes and sustainable behaviours (Stevenson et al., 2012). Research indicates the role of education in equipping individuals with the knowledge and skills required to address environmental challenges effectively (Gupta et al., 2024; Hnatyuk et al., 2024; Nyika and Mwema, 2021). In integrating environmental education into curricula, schools serve as platforms for promoting environmental stewardship and driving societal change (Corpuz et al., 2022). Studies show that students exposed to environmental education programmes demonstrate increased participation in eco-friendly activities, such as recycling and energy conservation (Gupta et al., 2024). For instance, experiential learning activities such as nature walks and school gardens have proven effective in engaging students and enhancing their environmental literacy (Suarlin, 2023). These initiatives also promote intergenerational influence, as students share their learning with family and community members, thereby broadening the impact of environmental education (Ballantyne et al., 2001; Duvall and Zint, 2007). However, challenges such as limited resources, variability in teacher preparedness and inconsistent policy implementation continue to impede the full realisation of the potential of environmental education (Gralton et al., 2004; Mani and Vivekanandan, 2020; Nyika and Mwema, 2021). To maximise the effectiveness of environmental education programmes, researchers suggest incorporating features that empower students to initiate environmental discussions and actions within their communities.

In Johannesburg, school food gardens have been established to promote food security, sustainability and environmental education (Beery et al., 2014). Despite these efforts, the adoption of sustainable practices remains limited. For instance, only 0.1 per cent of Johannesburg’s population utilises rainwater harvesting technology, due to financial, reliability and maintenance concerns (Ndeketeya and Dundu, 2019). Research highlights the need for more structured, locally relevant environmental education programmes that address Johannesburg’s unique environmental pressures.

While environmental education projects in South Africa have achieved notable successes, challenges persist in ensuring their sustainability and impact. Studies indicate that resource limitations, inadequate teacher training and insufficient community involvement are major barriers to effective environmental education implementation (Manaka and Maile, 2021; Mashaba et al., 2022). Addressing these gaps requires a multifaceted approach that includes policy reinforcement, capacity building for teachers and the integration of innovative teaching methods. For example, incorporating localised environmental issues into the curriculum can make environmental education more relevant and engaging for students. Community-based projects, such as waste management projects and water conservation programmes, have a potential to foster collective responsibility and enhance the practical application of environmental knowledge (Vieira et al., 2022). Schools can create immersive learning experiences that empower students to become active participants in environmental stewardship.

Theoretical framework

Experiential learning theory serves as the theoretical framework for this study. Developed by David Kolb (1984), experiential learning theory emphasises the central role that experience plays in the learning process. Kolb defines experiential learning theory as a process in which knowledge is created through learning by doing, transformation of experiences, and reflection. Knowledge results from the combination of grasping and transforming experience (Mayombe, 2024). Kolb’s (1984) experiential learning theory presents four cycles of elements: real experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualisation and active experimentation (Novani and Arief, 2021). Novani and Arief (2021) further mention that students must go through each stage of experiencing, reflecting, thinking and acting. This process is particularly suited for environmental education, where students engage with environmental issues through hands-on activities that not only build knowledge but also foster critical thinking and problem-solving skills. This cycle illustrates how students can integrate and apply new knowledge in practical settings.

Figure 1 represents Kolb’s (1984) experiential learning cycle in the context of environmental education in Johannesburg schools. The cycle illustrates how students move through the stages of concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualisation and active experimentation.

Figure 1
Figure 1

Experiential learning cycle (Source: Kolb, 1984) 

Concrete experience

This stage should involve providing students with direct engagement in environmental activities. For example, schools could involve students in waste sorting, recycling, energy conservation or gardening projects. By doing so, students can acquire concrete experiences that anchor future learning.

Reflective observation

Schools should encourage students to critically reflect on these hands-on activities. Facilitated reflection sessions could help students analyse the significance of their actions and the environmental implications of such initiatives, deepening their understanding beyond surface-level engagement.

Abstract conceptualisation

Through guided reflection, students could be supported in connecting their experiences to broader environmental concepts, such as sustainability, climate change and conservation. This could help them form or adjust their understanding of key environmental principles.

Active experimentation

Finally, schools could encourage students to apply their newly formed knowledge by designing or participating in projects aimed at addressing real environmental challenges within their schools or communities, such as proposing waste management strategies or promoting renewable energy solutions.

Relevance to the study

The application of experiential learning theory in this study highlights the importance of experiential learning in fostering environmental awareness and eco-friendly practices among high school students. By engaging in hands-on activities, students are able to:

  • develop practical skills: Through active participation in environmental activities, students acquire practical skills that are essential for sustainable living

  • enhance critical thinking: Reflecting on their experiences allows students to develop critical thinking skills and a deeper understanding of environmental issues

  • promote environmental stewardship: By applying their knowledge in real-world contexts, students become more committed to environmental stewardship and sustainability.

The study further reinforces the effectiveness of experiential learning theory in promoting sustainable development and responsible environmental actions.

Methodology

Research methodology is a collective term for the structured process of conducting research (Creswell and Creswell, 2018). A research methodology seeks to inform why the research study has been undertaken, how the problem has been defined, in what way, why the hypothesis has been formulated, what data has been collected, what particular method has been adopted and the method to analyse the data (Patel and Patel, 2019). The research methodology of this study comprises a research design, research setting and participants profile, data collection methods, data analysis, validity and reliability, and ethical considerations.

Research design

Research design is a plan or guide for data collection and interpretation, with sets of rules that enable the researcher to conceptualise and observe the problem under study (Hennink et al., 2020). This study employs a qualitative approach to explore the level of environmental awareness and the existence of eco-friendly practices among high school students in the Johannesburg Central District. Qualitative methods are well suited for this type of research as they provide perspectives on participants’ behaviours, attitudes and experiences related to environmental issues, aligning with the study goals. The choice of a case study design is particularly appropriate for several reasons. As Priya (2021) explains, a case study allows researchers to conduct an in-depth exploration of programmes, events or activities within their actual contexts. In this study, the selected schools serve as specific ‘cases’, offering the opportunity to investigate environmental awareness and eco-friendly practices within real-life settings. This aligns with the focus on understanding waste management, energy conservation and environmental projects in these schools.

Moreover, the use of case studies is widely supported in environmental education research. Maxwell and Chmiel (2014) and Schulze (1992) highlight the relevance of case studies for evaluating environmental education programmes, as this method enables a detailed examination of practical implementations while adhering to qualitative quality standards. Additionally, prior studies (for example, Fayyaz et al., 2023; Manaka and Maile, 2021; Mashaba et al., 2022) have successfully employed qualitative approaches, including case studies, to assess environmental awareness and practices among students, further validating the method’s effectiveness in similar contexts. In this study each school was referred to as a case (Table 1).

Table 1

Cases 

School Case Designation
School A Case A Government school – semi-urban area
School B Case B Government school – urban area
School C Case C Government school – semi-urban area
School D Case D Government school – urban area

Research setting and participants

The research was conducted in four high schools within the Johannesburg Central District. These schools were selected to represent a cross-section of the district, ensuring an understanding of environmental practices and awareness across different school environments. The population of this study were only high school students who are directly involved in, or affected by, environmental activities within their schools. A sample is a subset of the population, selected to be a representative of the larger population (Banks and Piggott, 2022). The high school students’ population comprises two phases which are part of the senior phase and the Further Education and Training (FET) phase: Grade 8 for the senior phase and Grade 11 for the FET phase. The researchers could not study the entire population, since it was too large to study, hence the selection of 24 Grade 8 and 26 Grade 11 students, who were purposively selected to represent the entire population of the high school students. Grade 8 was purposively selected as they are in the initial stages of high school learning. This could give the researchers an insight into the environmental awareness knowledge content that Grade 8 students have in terms of environmental education. Grade 11 students were also purposively selected, since they are in almost the final stages of high school. From the first two selected schools (Case A and Case B), data were collected from the Grade 8 students, and the last two selected government high schools’ data were collected from the Grade 11 (Case C and Case D) students.

All participants completed questionnaires, but only eight participants were selected for interviews. The cases were represented by these students during questionnaires and interviews (Table 2).

Table 2

Participants 

Grade 8 students Grade 11 students
Case A Case B Case C Case D
G0801
G0802
G0803
G0804
G0805
G0806
G0807
G0808
G0809
G0810
G0811
G0812
G0813
G0814
G0815
G0816
G0817
G0818
G0819
G0820
G0821
G0822
G0823
G0824
G1101
G1102
G1103
G1104
G1105
G1106
G1107
G1108
G1109
G1110
G1111
G1112
G1113
G1114
G1115
G1116
G1117
G1118
G1119
G1120
G1121
G1122
G1123
G1124
G1125
G1126

Data collection methods

Data collection is a crucial stage in any research study, enabling researchers to gather information for answering research questions, testing hypotheses and achieving study objectives (Karunarathna et al., 2024). To collect rich data, the study utilised a combination of interviews, observations and questionnaires. This triangulation of methods ensures the validity and reliability of the findings by cross-verifying information from multiple sources (Moon, 2019). As mentioned, 50 students (26 Grade 11 and 24 Grade 8) represented the entire population. Semi-structured questionnaires were distributed to all 50 students to gather qualitative data on their environmental knowledge and practices. The questionnaires included open-ended questions to obtain a broad understanding of the students’ environmental awareness and actions. However, because some of the responses provided by participants were short, the researchers saw a need to conduct semi-structured interviews following questionnaires with only 8 students (4 Grade 8 and 4 Grade 11 students, meaning 2 students from each school).

Only 8 students (G0803 and G0805 from Case A; G0814 and G0822 from Case B; G1103 and G1105 from Case C; and G1114 and G1115 from Case D) were sampled for semi-structured interviews from the whole group of participants in order for the researchers to get more information on the responses they gave on questionnaires. The interview questions were designed to elicit detailed information about the participants’ involvement in, and perceptions of, environmental activities. The interviews provided rich qualitative data on the participants’ experiences, knowledge and attitudes towards environmental practices.

Non-participatory observations were conducted to capture the actual implementation of environmental activities in the schools. These observations focused on waste management practices, energy conservation efforts and environmental projects such as gardening and tree planting. Observation may be seen as the very foundation of everyday social interaction: as people participate in social life, they are diligent observers and commentators of others’ behaviour (Ciesielska et al., 2018). Observations allowed the researchers to see at first hand how these activities were carried out, and to note any differences between reported practices and actual behaviour.

Data analysis

Data were collected, cleaned and analysed using thematic analysis, which is suitable for identifying and interpreting patterns within qualitative data (Dawit, 2020). The results were organised into themes and categories. According to Saraswathi and Stanly (2018), thematic analysis structures learning around a central context over time. Interviews and observations were transcribed verbatim, while questionnaire responses were compiled and coded. Coding categories were aligned with the research questions and the experiential learning theory framework. These were then grouped into key themes, including waste management, energy conservation and environmental projects, alongside themes on environmental knowledge and its practical application. Finally, the themes were interpreted in relation to the study’s objectives and theoretical framework to explore how experiential learning influenced students’ environmental awareness and practices.

Validity and reliability

Validity is about what an instrument measures and how well it does so (Noble and Smith, 2015). Ahmed and Ishtiaq (2021) state that reliability concerns the truthfulness in the data obtained and the degree to which any measuring tool controls random error. To ensure the validity and reliability of the findings, several strategies were employed. Using multiple data collection methods (interviews, observations and questionnaires) helped to cross-verify the data and enhance the credibility of the findings. Preliminary findings were shared with participants to verify the accuracy of the data and interpretations. The research process and findings were reviewed by peers and experts in environmental education to ensure rigour and validity.

Ethical considerations

Ethics deals with moral problems related to the practice of research (Mirza et al., 2023). Bos (2020) refers to ethics as an enquiry into what is right and wrong, and what researchers ought to do. The study adhered to ethical guidelines to protect the rights and well-being of the participants. First, permission to conduct the study was requested from the affiliated institution through the process of applying for an ethical clearance certificate with REF: 2022/06/08/61661481/10/AM for a master’s degree study. Participants were informed about the purpose of the study, the methods of data collection, and their rights. Consent was obtained from all participants before the data collection commenced. The confidentiality of the participants was maintained by anonymising their responses and ensuring that data were securely stored. Participation in the study was voluntary, and participants were free to withdraw at any time without any consequences. Participants were not known to either of the researchers before the commencement of the study.

Results and discussion

There were two research questions that the researchers aimed to answer:

  1. RQ1.

    What are the environmental activities that are carried out in schools which portray environmental awareness?

  2. RQ2.

    What are the strategies that can be adopted to improve environmental awareness and mitigate environmental-related problems?

As mentioned above, the researchers used the thematic analysis method. In this research, two themes were derived: the environmental activities carried out in high schools and the environmental knowledge that learners have acquired. Each theme was derived from interview, observations and questionnaire questions that were answered by the students on their view of their environmental awareness and their related practices.

Theme 1: environmental activities carried out in schools

Environmental activities are any events which reduce or eliminate pressures on the environment, and which aim at making more efficient use of resources (Zsóka et al., 2013). According to Carson (2011), Earth’s living things interact with their environment. This interaction may lead to environmental damage, if it is not controlled or replenished; hence, the need for environmental activities to be carried out. In this study, the researchers collected information on some environmental activities that were carried out by learners in high schools. These included waste management, conserving energy, and some projects carried out in schools to enhance environmental education which fall under categories of this theme.

Waste management 

In this category, the researchers aimed to understand how waste is managed in schools. Waste management practices varied among the four cases observed. According to Demirbas (2011), waste management involves the process of gathering, transporting and processing waste before disposal. Nyika et al. (2019) and Maphosa (2023) state that waste management is a challenge in developing countries such as the Republic of South Africa. The findings of this study reveal a complex landscape of waste management practices in schools, shaped by institutional frameworks, student behaviours and community engagement. Effective waste management, as emphasised by Tchobanoglous et al. (1993), is important for safeguarding the environment and public health.

The findings highlight both successful initiatives and areas needing improvement, reflecting varying levels of awareness and action among schools and students. Additionally, these findings align with the experiential learning theory principles, illustrating how concrete experiences and reflective observation may foster environmental awareness. Institutional practices play a major role in shaping waste management behaviours (Boateng and East, 2011). The researchers had to observe how waste is managed in these sampled four cases, which includes the quantity and type of rubbish bins, recycling materials used, and other possible ways of reducing waste, such as compost making. In Cases B and D, it was observed that schools used labelled sorting bins and organised rubbish collection systems, and they involved the community in waste management by allowing them to come to the school grounds to collect waste. During participatory observation, the researchers observed students from Cases B and D picking up rubbish and throwing it in the labelled bins. In Case B, it was done according to the classes on duty after the break. In Case D, all students would pick up the rubbish after breaks and after school sessions. In these two cases, the researchers also observed that some underprivileged people were allowed in schools on specific days to collect the sorted trash for sale to recycling companies. These practices aligned with the recommendations by other scholars emphasising community engagement in sustainable practices (Davids, 2023; Fine, 1993; Kaswan and Rathi, 2019).

Case C implemented a waste disposal policy that mandated the use of bins and penalised littering. Case C did not have sorting bins, but there was a culture of dustbins in corridors, as well as in each classroom. The policy stated that litter was only to be disposed of in dustbins. The repercussions of not following the policy were also stated, such as the cleaning-up of the corridors. The application of the policy assisted in minimising trash dumping. The researchers also observed that most students in Case A carried reusable water bottles to fill with water before going back to their classrooms after break. In Case A, a borehole was installed, and most students drank water from the borehole more than any other drinks. In Case A, as well as in Case C, students used paper packs to serve food sold at their tuckshops. Moreover, in Case C, they used paper straws for drinking their juice or other cold drinks. The use of reusable bottles results in a smaller number of empty bottles to be thrown into dustbins, hence less plastic production and waste in the landfills, thereby reducing pollution. Buying cold drinks and juices results in more litter in school; however, the paper plates are easily biodegradable, which is an advantage to the environment. These results imply that in high schools, students put a lot of effort into reducing waste in the environment. Moreover, students are aware of the advantages of using reusable materials.

The observed behaviour in Cases B and D of throwing rubbish carelessly, and only waiting for the end of breaks to pick up rubbish and throw it in the bins, portrayed an environmentally irresponsible behaviour. Students seem to understand that the throwing of litter poses a threat to the environment. However, the tendency of being environmentally irresponsible and only correcting mistakes afterwards is a huge challenge. In Case C, a policy stipulated that the throwing of litter was a serious offence with serious consequences. These measures not only support structured waste management; they are also aligned with South Africa’s National Waste Management Act (2008), which emphasises the need for clear guidelines and enforcement (DEAFF, 2017).

From the questionnaires, students’ behaviour varied significantly across the cases, reflecting differing levels of environmental responsibility. The researchers wanted to understand students’ behaviour towards the management of waste. The researchers asked what students would do with a piece of rubbish when there is no rubbish bin nearby. In Case C, students displayed proactive behaviour, such as actively seeking out bins for proper disposal, even at the expense of being late for class. Student G1112 responded, ‘I would rather be late for class looking for a trash bin to dispose of the waste in a proper place.’ Student G1108 explained that ‘trash will be collected for recycling if properly disposed’. However, Case A students were not that concerned about throwing rubbish carelessly. Some responded that they would leave rubbish on desks for the maintenance people to pick up. Student G0808 mentioned that she will ‘leave the trash on their feeding tables for the cleaners to correctly dispose the trash’. This reveals that students from this school are not encouraged to be part of waste management in the school, which leads to more pollution in the school environment.

Another question was based on recycling as a form of waste management practice. Some students listed the following items: plastic items such as juice and water bottles, sauce and spice bottles, plain plastic and paper drinking cups, cold drink bottles, newspapers, cardboard, office papers, books and magazines. All Cases (A, B, C and D) defined recycling as the process of converting waste into reusable materials. However, there were a few students in all cases who failed to give a proper definition of recycling. For example, from Cases A and B, students G0804 and G0814 respectively defined recycling as to ‘cut back on the amount of trash generated’. This contrasts with the less proactive behaviours observed in Cases B and D, where students waited until breaks to collect litter, and Case A, where some students left rubbish on desks for cleaners to dispose of. These behaviours highlight the varying levels of experiential learning observed in students. Concrete experiences, such as interacting with sorting bins and adhering to policies, provided students with opportunities for reflective observation. However, the inconsistency in proactive responsibility suggests a need for enhanced educational activities to deepen students’ engagement with environmental practices (Mkhonto and Mnguni, 2021).

The findings of the questionnaires further illustrate students’ understanding of waste management and recycling. Most students across all cases defined recycling correctly and identified recyclable items such as plastic bottles and paper products. However, the depth of understanding varied, with some students providing only superficial responses. For instance, while many students recognised the environmental benefits of recycling, their explanations often lacked detail. These findings highlight the importance of reinforcing both knowledge and practical application through experiential learning opportunities. Students’ knowledge of the relationship between waste management and climate change was explored through interviews. Several students articulated this connection effectively, linking recycling to reduced greenhouse gas emissions and the conservation of natural resources. For example, a student in Case A, G0803, explained that ‘Using recycled materials reduces the need for new raw materials, which often release excessive greenhouse gases during extraction.’ Another student, in Case C, G1105, mentioned that ‘people need to practise smart shopping where they will be using reusable bags rather than disposable bags that can increase the greenhouse gases’.

Another student, from Case B, G0814, elaborated on this by encouraging customers to buy products from recycled materials such as paper and plastics, which also reduce energy consumption. Another student, from Case D, G1115, explained that ‘environmental science of climate change is that the more waste prevention and recycling paper products are promoted it will allow more trees to remain standing, where they can continue to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and reduce the existence of climate change’. Despite these profound responses, many students provided one-word answers, indicating a gap in their ability to articulate and expand on these concepts. This suggests a need for educational programmes that encourage deeper reflection and understanding, enabling students to relate human activities to environmental issues.

The findings collectively point out the importance of integrating institutional support, community engagement and experiential learning to promote effective waste management practices. Policies and practical measures provide the structure needed for consistent behaviour, while community involvement fosters a sense of collective responsibility. Students’ behaviours reflect the stages of experiential learning, with concrete experiences and reflective observation contributing to their understanding of waste management. However, gaps in proactive responsibility and depth of knowledge indicate areas for improvement. Schools should prioritise structured educational programmes and experiential activities to strengthen students’ active engagement with environmental practices, ultimately promoting a culture of sustainability.

Energy conservation 

This category highlights the efforts made by schools and students to conserve energy, focusing particularly on light energy and renewable energy sources. According to Jaelani et al. (2020), energy conservation involves reducing wasteful energy consumption through various means. Bahinipati et al. (2022) and Zaman et al. (2023) point to the importance of technological upgrades and behaviour change in achieving energy efficiency. Renewable energy sources, particularly solar energy, were also adopted in some schools. Energy conservation practices observed in schools are aligned with global and local sustainability initiatives, reflecting both behavioural and technological approaches to reducing energy consumption. These practices are further linked to students’ understanding of the relationship between human activities and environmental conservation.

From observations, it was evident that most schools utilised natural sunlight to reduce reliance on artificial lighting during the day. Students were seen turning off lights in unoccupied rooms, and switching them on only when necessary, such as during cloudy weather or in dark environments. For instance, in Cases A, B, C and D, areas such as the auditorium, school hall and laboratories remained unlit when not in use. This practice not only conserved energy but also fostered an environmentally conscious culture among students. Such behaviours align with Booysen et al. (2021), who emphasise the importance of using natural light to minimise electricity consumption, particularly as lighting accounts for a significant portion of energy use in schools.

In addition to behavioural changes, technological advancements were also observed. Cases A, B and D implemented energy-saving LED lights, which consume 85 per cent less energy than traditional bulbs. Furthermore, Cases A and D extended their conservation efforts by incorporating renewable energy sources such as solar panels. In Case A, solar panels were installed across all classrooms and the administration block, enabling the school to function normally even during loadshedding. In Case D, solar panels were installed in the administration block, ensuring uninterrupted office work during power outages. These findings align with Jaelani et al. (2020) and Gillani et al. (2022), who advocate for the adoption of renewable energy sources such as solar power to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate climate change impacts. The efforts highlighted the critical role of schools in promoting energy sustainability while serving as models for environmentally responsible behaviour.

Interviews conducted as part of this study also shed light on students’ understanding of the link between human activities and energy conservation. Many students identified recycling as a key activity that contributes to energy conservation, with one student from Case C, G1103, explaining that ‘manufacturing products from recycled materials requires less energy than producing items from raw materials’. Another student from Case C, G1105, highlighted the environmental harm caused by energy-intensive activities, such as the ‘burning of fossil fuels’. Both students suggested alternative cleaner energy sources, including solar and hydroelectric power. For example, a student from Case D, G1114, mentioned the benefits of ‘using public transport to reduce carbon emissions from private vehicles’. These responses indicate that students have a foundational awareness of energy conservation and its broader environmental implications, particularly in relation to climate change. This awareness is consistent with the findings of Zaman et al. (2023) and Ragab et al. (2022), who emphasise the importance of behavioural changes and technological upgrades in achieving energy efficiency.

The questionnaire results further highlighted the need for enhanced teaching on energy conservation. While approximately half of the students reported involvement in environmental conservation projects, many suggested additional measures to improve energy efficiency at school level. Common responses included teaching all students about energy conservation, powering down equipment when not in use and adopting energy efficient habits. A few students provided more advanced suggestions from Case A, including students G0804, G0808 and G0811, and one from Case D, G1118, who mentioned ‘installing programmable thermostats to regulate heating and cooling, using proper insulation to minimise energy loss and incorporating energy efficient appliances’. Another exceptional response was from most learners in Case A and one in Case B, G0817, who mentioned ‘the use of energy efficient appliances, such as refrigerators and freezers, in the schools to reduce energy use’. These responses support a spectrum of awareness levels, with some students demonstrating understanding, while others require further teaching to fully grasp energy conservation practices.

The findings also revealed significant gaps in participation and awareness. Despite the efforts made in schools such as Cases A, B and D, a considerable portion of students lacked active involvement in energy conservation activities. This suggests the need for schools to implement structured programmes that encourage greater participation and awareness. According to Chung and Rhee (2014), educational institutions are uniquely positioned to instil energy efficient habits in students, which can have long-term benefits for both individual behaviours and broader societal sustainability. The study demonstrates that energy conservation in schools is achieved through a combination of behavioural practices, technological advancement and renewable energy adoption. While progress has been made, particularly in Cases A and D, there remains a need to address gaps in awareness and participation among students. Schools should prioritise educational projects that integrate both theoretical knowledge and practical applications, promoting a culture of sustainability. This practice can enhance energy efficiency, reduce environmental impacts and contribute to global efforts to combat climate change.

Theme 2: environmental knowledge acquired by the learners to solve environmental problems

Environmental knowledge refers to the information individuals possess about environmental issues, and their ability to understand and evaluate their societal and environmental impacts (Vallero, 2021). This section discusses the findings related to the environmental knowledge students had acquired, focusing on sustainable use of natural resources and environmental projects. Through observations, semi-structured interviews and questionnaires, the researchers gathered perspectives on students’ understanding and the environmental skills practised in schools.

Sustainable use of natural resources 

The sustainability of natural resources is a global challenge requiring focused attention from policymakers and teachers (Chau et al., 2022). Human societies depend on natural resources, making their careful management important for current and future generations (Tu et al., 2019). During the administering of questionnaires, two key questions were raised to explore students’ understanding of sustainability. The first asked students to define sustainability. Grade 11 students in Cases C and D demonstrated a clear understanding, describing sustainability as avoiding the depletion of resources. However, many Grade 8 students in Cases A and B provided incorrect answers, equating sustainability with resource exploitation. The second question asked students to identify the most important activity to ensure environmental health for future generations. Grade 11 students highlighted the importance of efficient use of energy and materials, while Grade 8 students struggled with the concept. These findings suggest that older students’ understanding of sustainability improves with increased exposure to environmental education, emphasising the need to integrate environmental education into curricula from an early stage.

Semi-structured interviews further explored students’ knowledge of the impact of unsustainable resource use. Student G1105 from Case C noted, ‘Unsustainable land use patterns are the root causes of environmental degradation.’ Another student, G1114 from Case D, highlighted the link between deforestation for firewood and global warming. Similarly, student G0822 from Case B, also explained, ‘The overexploitation of coal produces harmful fumes and accelerates climate change.’ These responses indicate that students are aware of the environmental consequences of unsustainable practices and recognise the importance of monitoring resource use to minimise degradation. The environment is more prone to destruction due to the increase in pressures (Gupta et al., 2016), hence there is a need for sustainable management of the environment. This is in line with work by Teane (2021), who conducted a study in the Manyeledi rural village in the North-West province. This province, like most rural areas, was experiencing environmental degradation caused by the depletion of natural resources, and poor farming practices (Teane, 2021).

The researchers then observed sustainable attitudes in all four cases, including energy efficiency, waste reduction, water conservation and green building practices. In Case B, a trench redirected tap water spillage to banana trees, minimising water waste. In Case A, buildings were constructed using sustainable, non-toxic materials such as bamboo and reclaimed wood, contributing to better indoor air quality. These practices align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (Montiel et al., 2021), emphasising sustainable water management and clean energy. The findings reveal that while older students grasp the concept of sustainability, younger students require more foundational knowledge. Practices such as water conservation and sustainable building design provide concrete examples for students to understand and apply sustainability principles.

Environmental projects 

The findings of this study further highlight the critical role of environmental projects in promoting environmental awareness and addressing environmental challenges. Projects such as school gardening, tree planting, compost making and water storage were observed in various schools, reflecting a commitment to promoting environmental awareness and sustainability among students.

The projects are not only instrumental in addressing local environmental issues; they also serve as tools for teaching practical skills and promoting a sense of responsibility among students. During observations, school gardening was a common feature across all the cases studied. Each case had a vegetable garden, although the type of vegetables and the level of maintenance varied. In Case A, the garden was lush and well-maintained, with the use of sprinkler pipes for irrigation. However, students’ participation was minimal, as the maintenance work was predominantly carried out by hired groundskeepers. In contrast, in Cases B, C and D, students actively participated in the maintenance of the gardens, including watering, weeding and seeding during designated times. This active involvement aligns with the findings of Maciel et al. (2022), who demonstrated that participation in school gardening projects not only fosters environmental knowledge, but also instils values such as cooperation and respect. However, the study also revealed that for meaningful learning to occur, students need to be involved in all stages of gardening – from bed preparation to planting – to develop skills that they can apply at home and in their communities (Maciel et al., 2022).

Tree planting was another prominent project observed in all the cases, with varying levels of maintenance and use. Case A stood out, with its orchard of fruit trees, while Case B showcased recently planted trees at the school entrance, symbolising the promotion of tree planting to visitors. In Case C, older, poorly maintained trees were observed, suggesting a lack of integration of this resource into students’ daily activities. In Case D, trees provided shade for students during lunch breaks, demonstrating practical benefits. The importance of tree-planting projects lies in their multifaceted environmental benefits, as highlighted by students during the study. The findings echo the work of Anabaraonye et al. (2022), who advocate for tree planting as an important environmental protection strategy.

Compost making was observed as an exceptional practice in Case C. Students actively collected biodegradable materials, including food waste from feeding schemes and tuckshops to create compost. This compost was then used in the school garden, reducing the need for artificial fertilisers. In alignment with the findings of this study, Waliczek et al. (2016) noted that composting programmes enhance students’ environmental attitudes and knowledge. Participating in compost making, students not only contribute to waste reduction, but also develop an understanding of sustainable soil management practices, promoting long-term environmental balance. Water conservation efforts were particularly notable in Case B, where a large rainwater tank reservoir was installed to collect and store water during the rainy season. This stored water was used to irrigate plants during dry periods, reducing reliance on tap water. Such practices emphasise the importance of sustainable water management in schools (Karthe et al., 2016; Pamla et al., 2021). The integration of rainwater harvesting systems in schools is particularly relevant in regions prone to climatic challenges. These projects serve as practical demonstrations of sustainable water use, encouraging students to adopt similar practices in their households.

The study also explored students’ perspectives on environmental projects through questionnaires and interviews. Many students demonstrated an understanding of the environmental benefits of projects such as tree planting and compost making. For instance, in questionnaires, student G1113 from Case C, and G0803 from Case A, mentioned that ‘trees supply oxygen which will be utilized by other organisms that are found in the environment for the process of respiration’. The other responses that were given by students from Cases B and D were, ‘trees are important to the environment as their roots bind the soil particles together thereby reducing environmental degradation.’ Some other students were able to describe the functions of trees. For instance, student G0814 from Case B mentioned that ‘trees can be habitats of other species, such as birds’. Student G1117 from Case D stated that ‘trees are part of the food chain which enables energy flow in the ecosystem’.

During interviews, some students provided detailed responses about sustainable agricultural practices, such as crop rotation, which improves soil fertility and reduces the need for chemical fertilisers. Student G1103 from Case C gave a detailed explanation of the school gardening reducing environmental degradation when she mentioned ‘some plants will leave nutrients in the soil which can be utilised by the next plant’. The student gave an example of leguminous plants. Another student, G0822 from Case B, explained that ‘by crop rotation there will be no need to use artificial fertilisers which will degrade the environment’. These responses point to the value of experiential learning in promoting environmental knowledge and awareness. As students engage in hands-on activities, they develop practical skills and understanding of environmental processes, which they can apply to address environmental challenges in their communities.

Despite these positive findings, the study also revealed gaps in student participation and project implementation. While some schools, such as Case C, effectively included students in environmental projects, others, such as Case A, relied heavily on external labour, limiting opportunities for students to engage meaningfully. This emphasises the need for schools to adopt more inclusive approaches that actively involve students in all stages of environmental projects. Additionally, while many students displayed basic environmental knowledge, there is a need for understanding and encouragement of proactive environmental stewardship. Environmental projects in schools provide a platform for promoting sustainability and addressing environmental challenges – engaging students in hands-on activities such as gardening, tree planting and compost making. Schools can promote a culture of environmental responsibility and equip students with the skills and knowledge needed to mitigate pressing environmental issues. To maximise the influence of these projects, schools should prioritise student engagement and adopt innovative practices such as rainwater harvesting. These efforts not only promote environmental awareness among students but also contribute to broader sustainability goals, addressing challenges such as climate change, soil degradation and water scarcity.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, several practical recommendations are proposed to enhance environmental awareness and sustainable practices within schools. These recommendations aim to address key challenges identified in this research, and to provide actionable steps that schools can implement to strengthen environmental education and promote sustainability.

  1. Develop and enforce school-specific waste management policies.

    • Policies should be actionable and tailored to each school’s context.

    • Focus on waste reduction, sorting and recycling practices.

    • Support these initiatives with awareness campaigns to foster a culture of responsibility among students and staff.

  2. Integrate experiential learning in the curriculum.

    • Include hands-on activities such as composting, gardening and recycling.

    • Ensure students are actively involved in all stages, from planning to execution.

  3. Promote community involvement.

    • Build partnerships with parents, local stakeholders and community organisations.

    • Involve community members in programmes such as recycling initiatives or rainwater harvesting to encourage shared environmental responsibility.

  4. Provide resources for renewable energy projects.

    • Equip schools with solar panels and energy-efficient systems.

    • Use these projects as both educational tools and practical ways to reduce environmental impact.

  5. Enhance teacher training on environmental education.

    • Train teachers to integrate environmental topics effectively into their lessons.

    • Emphasise the use of localised environmental examples to make learning more relatable.

  6. Implement monitoring and evaluation systems.

    • Establish systems to assess the effectiveness of environmental programmes.

    • Conduct regular reviews to ensure continuous improvement and alignment with best practices.

Conclusion

This study sheds light on the different environmental awareness and practices among high school students in Johannesburg, revealing both positive initiatives and areas requiring improvement. The findings highlight varying degrees of success in waste management, energy conservation and participation in environmental projects across the sampled schools. While some schools demonstrated commendable practices and student engagement, others faced challenges related to policy enforcement and student participation. Importantly, the study concludes that Kolb’s (1984) experiential learning theory provided a valuable lens for understanding these patterns. Experiential learning theory helped explain how students’ engagement with concrete environmental activities (for example, waste sorting, gardening and energy conservation) contributed to the development of environmental knowledge and awareness. For instance, in schools where students actively participated in environmental projects, students progressed through the experiential learning cycle – gaining practical experience, engaging in reflective observation, connecting experiences to broader environmental concepts and applying knowledge to improve school and community practices.

The findings show that while experiential learning opportunities existed in all cases, their effectiveness varied based on how well the learning cycle was supported. In cases where students were only partially involved (for example, Case A relying on external labour for garden maintenance), gaps emerged in the reflective and conceptualisation stages of the learning process, limiting deeper understanding and long-term behavioural change. By contrast, cases with more integrated experiential activities, such as student-led waste management or composting initiatives, demonstrated stronger outcomes in terms of critical thinking and environmental responsibility. Therefore, the application of experiential learning theory proved instrumental in highlighting how experiential learning enhances students’ capacity for environmental stewardship, critical thinking and problem solving in real-world contexts. The theory underscores the importance of providing structured, hands-on activities that allow students to actively engage in environmental practices and then reflect on their learning. Moving forward, this study recommends that environmental education in schools should not only incorporate practical activities; it should also deliberately follow the experiential learning theory cycle. Schools should create learning environments where students experience, reflect, conceptualise and apply environmental knowledge meaningfully. Embedding experiential learning theory into environmental education practices – supported by strong policies and community partnerships – can foster lifelong environmental values among students and strengthen schools’ contribution to sustainability goals.

Declarations and conflicts of interest

Research ethics statement

The authors declare that research ethics approval for this article was provided by the University of South Africa ethics board (REF: 2022/06/08/61661481/10/AM).

Consent for publication statement

The authors declare that research participants’ informed consent to publication of findings – including photos, videos and any personal or identifiable information – was secured prior to publication.

Conflicts of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest with this work. All efforts to sufficiently anonymise the authors during peer review of this article have been made. The authors declare no further conflicts with this article.

References

Ahmed,I; Ishtiaq,S. (2021).  ‘Reliability and validity: Importance in medical research’.  The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association 71 (10) :2401–2406, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.06-861 [ PubMed ]

Anabaraonye,B; Anukwonke,C; Nwobu,E; Unachukwu,SS. (2022).  ‘Tree planting as a climate change adaptation strategy for sustainable development in Nigeria’.  International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology 3 (1) :40–44.

Bahinipati,CS; Sirohi,RA; Rao,SS. (2022).  ‘Technological innovations, behavioural interventions, and household energy conservation: Policy insights and lessons’.  Ecology Economy and Society – The INSEE Journal 5 (1) :530. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.37773/ees.v5i1.530

Ballantyne,R; Fien,JF; Packer,J. (2001).  ‘Program effectiveness in facilitating intergenerational influence in environmental education: Lessons from the field’.  The Journal of Environmental Education 32 :15–18, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00958960109598657

Banks,SC; Piggott,MP. (2022).  ‘Non-invasive genetic sampling is one of our most powerful and ethical tools for threatened species population monitoring: A reply to Lavery et al.’.  Biodiversity and Conservation 31 (2) :723–728, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-022-02377-x

Beery,M; Adatia,R; Segantin,O; Skaer,C. (2014).  ‘School food gardens: Fertile ground for education’.  Health Education 114 :281–292, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/HE-05-2013-0019

Bergman,BG. (2016).  ‘Assessing impacts of locally designed environmental education projects on students’ environmental attitudes, awareness, and intention to act’.  Environmental Education Research 22 :480–503, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.999225

Boateng,EA; East,L. (2011).  ‘The impact of dialysis modality on quality of life: A systematic review’.  Journal of Renal Care 37 (4) :190–200, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-6686.2011.00244.x [ PubMed ]

Booysen,MJ; Samuels,JA; Grobbelaar,SS. (2021).  ‘LED there be light: The impact of replacing lights at schools in South Africa’.  Energy and Buildings 235 :110736. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110736

Bos,J. (2020).  Research Ethics for Students in the Social Sciences. Berlin:Springer, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48415-6

Carson,SH. (2011).  ‘Creativity and psychopathology: A shared vulnerability model’.  The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 56 (3) :144–153, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/070674371105600304

Chau,TTT; Gehlen,M; Chevallier,F. (2022).  ‘A seamless ensemble-based reconstruction of surface ocean pCO2 and air–sea CO2 fluxes over the global coastal and open oceans’.  Bio Geosciences 19 (4) :1087–1109, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1087-2022

Chung,MH; Rhee,EK. (2014).  ‘Potential opportunities for energy conservation in existing buildings on university campus: A field survey in Korea’.  Energy and Buildings 78 :176–182, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.04.018

Ciesielska,M; Wolanik Boström,K; Öhlander,M. (2018).  ‘Observation methods’.  Qualitative Methodologies in Organization Studies. Cham:Springer, pp.32–52, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65442-3_2

Corpuz,AM; San Andres,T; Diaz,JD. (2022).  ‘Integration of environmental education (EE) in teacher education programs: Toward sustainable curriculum greening’.  Problems of Education in the 21st Century 80 (1) :119. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33225/pec/22.80.119

Creswell,JW; Creswell,JD. (2018).  Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 5th ed. Los Angeles:Sage.

Damoah,B; Adu,E. (2022).  ‘Environmental education in South African schools: The role of civil society organizations’.  Research in Social Sciences and Technology 7 (3) :1–17, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46303/ressat.2022.14

Davids,Z. (2023).  ‘Public Opinion Concerning the Feasibility of South Africa Meeting its Greenhouse Gas Emission Targets’.  Master’s dissertation. Cape Town, South Africa:University of Cape Town. Accessed 16 May 2025. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/39344.

Dawit,DA. (2020).  ‘An overview of data analysis and interpretations in research’.  International Journal of Academic Research in Education and Review 8 (1) :1–27, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14662/IJARER2020.015

DEAFF (Department of Environmental Affairs, Forestry and Fisheries). (2017).  ‘Deputy Minister Barbara Thomson on launch of inaugural South African Green Schools Programme’.  Accessed 16 May 2025. https://www.gov.za/speeches/south-african-green-schools-programme-launched-limpopo-25-apr-2017-0000.

Demirbas,A. (2011).  ‘Waste management, waste resource facilities and waste conversion processes’.  Energy Conversion and Management 52 (2) :1280–1287, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.09.025

Duvall,J; Zint,M. (2007).  ‘A review of research on the effectiveness of environmental education in promoting intergenerational learning’.  The Journal of Environmental Education 38 :14–24, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.38.4.14-24

Eten,S. (2015).  ‘Indigenizing Africa’s environmental education through a development education discourse for combating climate change’.  Policy and Practice: A development education review 21 :105–122.

Fayyaz,S; Lashari,AA; Nandwani,S; Chang,MA. (2023).  ‘Assessing environmental awareness and conservation behaviour in schools for sustainable development’.  Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 11 (4) :4070–4081, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.52131/pjhss.2023.1104.0675

Fine,M. (1993).  ‘[Ap]parent involvement: Reflections on parents, power, and urban public schools’.  Teachers College Record 94 (4) :1–19, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016146819309400402

Gillani,M; Niaz,HA; Farooq,MU; Ullah,A. (2022).  ‘Data collection protocols for VANETs: A survey’.  Complex and Intelligent Systems 8 (3) :2593–2622, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40747-021-00629-x

Gralton,A; Sinclair,MR; Purnell,K. (2004).  ‘Changes in attitudes, beliefs and behaviour: A critical review of research into the impacts of environmental education initiatives’.  Australian Journal of Environmental Education 20 :41–52, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0814062600002196

Gupta,A; Gupta,R; Singh,RL. (2016).  ‘Microbes and environment’.  Principles and Applications of Environmental Biotechnology for a Sustainable Future. Singh,RL(ed.),   Singapore:Springer Nature, pp.43–84, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1866-4_3

Gupta,MS; Samrutwar,AM; Rahandale,AM; Edlabadkar,AA. (2024).  ‘The influence of environmental education on college students’ behavioural attitudes towards sustainability’.  Journal of Learning and Educational Policy 4 (6) :48–58, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.55529/jlep.46.48.58

Halliday,GD. (2006).  ‘International perspectives on best practice in the development of urban environmental education, and education for sustainability programs’.  Australian Journal of Environmental Education 22 :141–145, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0814062600001804

Hennink,M; Hutter,I; Bailey,A. (2020).  Qualitative Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.

Hnatyuk,V; Pshenychna,N; Kara,S; Kolodii,V; Yaroshchuk,L. (2024).  ‘Education’s role in fostering environmental awareness and advancing sustainable development within a holistic framework’.  Multidisciplinary Reviews 7 :2024spe012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024spe012

Jaelani,A; Fauzi,H; Zaqiyah,QY. (2020).  ‘Penggunaan media online dalam proses kegiatan belajar PAI di massa pandemi COVID-19’.  Journal IKA Ikatan Alumni PGSD UNARS 8 (1) :12–24, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36841/pgsdunars.v8i1.579

Karthe,D; Reeh,T; Walther,M; Niemann,S; Siegmund,A. (2016).  ‘School-based environmental education in the context of a research and development project on integrated water resources management: Experiences from Mongolia’.  Environmental Earth Sciences 75 (18) :1286. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-6036-0

Karunarathna,I; Gunasena,P; Hapuarachchi,T; Ekanayake,U; Rajapaksha,S; Gunawardana,K; Aluthge,P; Bandara,S; Jayawardana,A; de Alvis,K; Gunathilake,S. (2024).  The Crucial Role of Data Collection in Research: Techniques, challenges, and best practices. Uva Clinical Research Lab, Accessed 18 May 2025. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383155720.

Kaswan,MS; Rathi,R. (2019).  ‘Analysis and modelling the enablers of green lean six sigma implementation using interpretive structural modelling’.  Journal of Cleaner Production 231 :1182–1191, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.253

Kolb,DA. (1984).  Experiential Learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Hoboken, NJ:Prentice-Hall.

Maciel,KFK; Fuentes-Guevara,MD; da Silva Gonçalves,C; Mendes,PM; de Souza,EG; Corrêa,LB. (2022).  ‘Mobile mandala garden as a tool of environmental education in an early childhood school in Southern Brazil’.  Journal of Cleaner Production 331 :129913. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129913

Mahirah,K; Nazatul,FH; Mohd,ASR. (2020).  ‘Tourists’ preferences for preservation of the world heritage site Stadthuys, Malacca’.  Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism 11 (2) :281–289, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14505//jemt.v11.2(42).06

Manaka,MJ; Maile,S. (2021).  ‘Learners’ knowledge of environmental education in selected primary schools of Tshwane north district, Gauteng province’.  Journal of Environmental Impact and Management Policy 2 (1) :1–12, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.55529/jeimp21.1.12

Mani,G; Vivekanandan,A. (2020).  ‘Perceptions and behaviour towards environment among high school students in Kancheepuram District, Tamil Nadu: A cross-sectional study’.  Journal of Comprehensive Health 8 (1) :45–52, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.53553/JCH.v08i01.009

Maphosa,C. (2023).  ‘Perceptions of teachers on the implementation of the waste management hierarchy within secondary schools’.  PhD thesis. South Africa:North-West University.

Mashaba,EK; Maile,S; Manaka,MJ. (2022).  ‘Learners’ knowledge of environmental education in selected primary schools of the Tshwane North District, Gauteng Province’.  International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19 (23) 15552 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315552 [ PubMed ]

Mathee,A; Byrne,J. (1996).  ‘Towards environment and health promoting South African schools’.  Urbanisation and Health Newsletter 28 :48–52.

Maxwell,JA; Chmiel,M. (2014).  Uwe,F(ed.),   ‘Notes toward a theory of qualitative data analysis’.  SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis. London:Sage, pp.21–34.

Mayombe,C. (2024).  ‘Promoting youths’ skills acquisition through experiential learning theory in vocational education and training in South Africa’.  Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning 14 (1) :130–145, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-10-2022-0216

Mbokazi,MS; Mkhasibe,RG; Uleanya,C. (2021).  ‘Measuring the effectiveness of environmental education programmes in promoting sustainable living in secondary schools’.  Technium Social Sciences Journal 23 (1) :164–176, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v23i1.2838

Mirza,H; Bellalem,F; Mirza,C. (2023).  ‘Ethical considerations in qualitative research: Summary guidelines for novice social science researchers’.  Social Studies and Research Journal 11 (1) :441–449.

Mkhonto,B; Mnguni,L. (2021).  ‘The impact of a rural school-based solid waste management project on learners’ perceptions, attitudes and understanding of recycling’.  Recycling 6 (4) 71 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/recycling6040071

Montiel,I; Cuervo-Cazurra,A; Park,J; Antolín-López,R; Husted,BW. (2021).  ‘Implementing the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals in international business’.  Journal of International Business Studies 52 (5) :999. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00445-y

Moon,MD. (2019).  ‘Triangulation: A method to increase validity, reliability, and legitimation in clinical research’.  Journal of Emergency Nursing 45 (1) :103–105, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2018.11.004

Ndeketeya,A; Dundu,M. (2019).  ‘Maximising the benefits of rainwater harvesting technology towards sustainability in urban areas of South Africa: A case study’.  Urban Water Journal 16 :163–169, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2019.1637907

Noble,H; Smith,J. (2015).  ‘Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research’.  Evidence-Based Nursing 18 (2) :34–35, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/eb-2015-102054

Novani,NP; Arief,L. (2021).  ‘Experiential learning method and hands-on approach for optimizing learning on signal and systems course’.  Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Development and Quality Assurance (ICED-QA 2020). Dordrecht:Atlantis Press, pp.355–359, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210202.064

Nyika,JM; Mwema,FM. (2021).  ‘Environmental education and its effects on environmental sustainability’.  Handbook of Research on Environmental Education Strategies for Addressing Climate Change and Sustainability. 1st ed. Karmaoui,A, Salem,AB;ABand Anees,MTMT(ed s .),   Hershey, PA:IGI Global, pp.182–199, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-7512-3.ch009

Nyika,J; Onyari,E; Mishra,S; Dinka,MO. (2019).  ‘Waste management in South Africa’.  Sustainable Waste Management Challenges in Developing Countries. Nyika,JM, Onyari,EK;EKand Mishra,S;S, Dinka,MOMO(ed s .),   Hershey, PA:IGI Global, pp.327–351, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-0198-6.ch014

Pamla,A; Thondhlana,G; Ruwanza,S. (2021).  ‘Persistent droughts and water scarcity: Households’ perceptions and practices in Makhanda, South Africa’.  Land 10 (6) 593 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/land10060593

Patel,M; Patel,N. (2019).  ‘Exploring research methodology’.  International Journal of Research and Review 6 (3) :48–55.

Priya,A. (2021).  ‘Case study methodology of qualitative research: Key attributes and navigating the conundrums in its application’.  Sociological Bulletin 70 (1) :1–14, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038022920970318

Ragab,KM; Orhan,MF; Saka,K; Zurigat,Y. (2022).  ‘A study and assessment of the status of energy efficiency and conservation at school buildings’.  Sustainability 14 (17) 10625 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su141710625

Sahidullah,A. (2022).  ‘Environmental awareness among high school students: A study in Majuli District of Assam, India’.  Ecology, Environment and Conservation 28 (1) :347–351, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.53550/EEC.2022.v28i01.051

Saraswathi,G; Stanly,SL. (2018).  ‘Thematic approach–A new perspective in teaching’.  Review of Research 7 (7) :1–7.

Schulze,S. (1992).  ‘Evaluation of environmental education centres–A research design for the case study method’.  The Southern African Journal of Environmental Education 12 :21–31.

Stevenson,RB, Brody,M;Mand Dillon,J;J, Wals,AEJAEJ(ed s .), . (2012).  International Handbook of Research on Environmental Education. 1st ed. London:Routledge, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203813331

Suarlin,S. (2023).  ‘Integrating environmental education to form environmental care characters in schools’.  Advances in Community Services Research 1 (2) :44–53, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.60079/acsr.v1i2.335

Tchobanoglous,G; Theisen,H; Vigil,SA. (1993).  Integrated Solid Waste Management: Engineering principles and management issues. New York:McGraw-Hill.

Teane,FM. (2021).  ‘Environmental awareness – Using non-formal education to impart skills and knowledge to improve crop yield: The case of Manyeledi community, South Africa’.  International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 30 (4) :299–313, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2020.1788777

Tu,Y; Ortiz,A; Gollub,RL; Cao,J; Gerber,J; Lang,C; Kong,J. (2019).  ‘Multivariate resting-state functional connectivity predicts responses to real and sham acupuncture treatment in chronic low back pain’.  NeuroImage: Clinical 23 :101885. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101885 [ PubMed ]

Vallero,DA. (2021).  Environmental Systems Science: Theory and practical applications. Amsterdam:Elsevier.

Vieira,ZCL; Rumenos,NN; Gheler-Costa,C; Spazziani,ML. (2022).  ‘Environmental education in urban cities: Planet regeneration through ecologically educating children and communities’.  International Journal of Educational Research Open 3 (1) :100208. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100208

Waliczek,M; Kijewska,M; Rudowska,M; Setner,B; Stefanowicz,P; Szewczuk,Z. (2016).  ‘Peptides labelled with pyridinium salts for sensitive detection and sequencing by electrospray tandem mass spectrometry’.  Scientific Reports 6 (1) :37720. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep37720

Zaman,J; Yu,K; Lee,JC. (2023).  ‘Individual differences in stimulus identification, rule induction, and generalization of learning’.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition 49 (6) :1004–1017, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001153

Zsóka,Á; Szerényi,ZM; Széchy,A; Kocsis,T. (2013).  ‘Greening due to environmental education? Environmental knowledge, attitudes, consumer behaviour and everyday pro-environmental activities of Hungarian high school and university students’.  Journal of Cleaner Production 48 :126–138, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.030