<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="EN">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="aggregator">10430</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>London Review of Education</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">1474-8460</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub"/>
<publisher>
        <publisher-name>IOE Press</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
</journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/14748460.2012.691284</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="sici">1474-8460(20120701)10:2L.201;1-</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">s7.phd</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="other">/ioep/clre/2012/00000010/00000002/art00007</article-id>
<article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Articles</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
<title-group>
        <article-title>Creative reflections on brainstorming</article-title>
      </title-group>
<contrib-group>
        <contrib xlink:type="simple">
          <name>
<surname>Byron</surname>
<given-names>Kevin</given-names>
</name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
<pub-date pub-type="created">
        <day>01</day>
        <month>07</month>
        <year>2012</year>
      </pub-date>
<volume>10</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<fpage>201</fpage>
<lpage>213</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-year>2012</copyright-year>
</permissions>
<self-uri content-type="journal_page" xlink:href="www.uclpress.co.uk/pages/london-review-of-education"/>
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      <abstract>
        <p>Brainstorming is the default method of idea-generation in organisations, and is widely applied in higher education by students, academics and support staff. Its popularity is mainly attributable to an illusory belief that groups working together are more productive than individuals
 working apart. Shared responsibility, the need for collaboration and the social dimension to work also sustains the popularity of brainstorming. To add further insight to the numerous studies that have been demonstrated the inefficiencies of brainstorming, this paper describes preliminary
 results on participants' self-reflection during a brainstorm. Recommendations are made for improving the productivity of group brainstorms.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>BRAINSTORMING</kwd>
        <kwd>GROUP DYNAMICS</kwd>
        <kwd>CREATIVE PROBLEM-SOLVING</kwd>
        <kwd>IDEA GENERATION</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
</article>
