<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="EN">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="aggregator">10430</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>London Review of Education</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">1474-8460</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub"/>
<publisher>
        <publisher-name>IOE Press</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
</journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18546/LRE.16.1.07</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="sici">1474-8460(20180327)16:1L.63;1-</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">s7.phd</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="other">/ioep/clre/2018/00000016/00000001/art00007</article-id>
<article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Articles - The EdD at 20: Lessons learned from professional doctorates</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
<title-group>
        <article-title>Pensive professionalism: The role of 'required reflection' on a professional doctorate</article-title>
      </title-group>
<contrib-group>
        <contrib xlink:type="simple">
          <name>
<surname>Cunningham</surname>
<given-names>Bryan</given-names>
</name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
<pub-date pub-type="created">
        <day>27</day>
        <month>03</month>
        <year>2018</year>
      </pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>63</fpage>
<lpage>74</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-year>2018</copyright-year>
</permissions>
<self-uri content-type="journal_page" xlink:href="www.uclpress.co.uk/pages/london-review-of-education"/>
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      <abstract>
        <p>This short paper examines the origins and nature of the reflective writing that is presently required on one part-taught doctorate in education (EdD) programme. It explores the various ways in which EdD candidates have engaged with self-reflection, using a number of extracts from writing
 submitted for formal assessments (including of the doctoral thesis itself, the culmination of their doctoral journey). The specific ways in which individuals have been caused to interrogate their place within, and contributions to, their respective professional realms are examined, as is the
 question of how writing in reflective vein has contributed to the evolution of professional identity. In the context of reflective writing, particular attention is paid to the ways in which the specific matter of developing confidence with accessing and manipulating language is frequently
 cited by individuals. As appropriate, connections are made in the paper between the above dimensions of what I am terming<italic> pensive professionalism</italic> and the perspectives of certain writers. The article concludes by drawing attention to the ways in which those of us involved in delivering
 professional doctorates need to be aware of, and induct our candidates into, the benefits of pensive professionalism.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>REFLECTIVE WRITING</kwd>
        <kwd>PROFESSIONAL IDENTITY</kwd>
        <kwd>PROFESSIONAL LEARNING</kwd>
        <kwd>METALEARNING</kwd>
        <kwd>LANGUAGE</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
</article>
