<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="EN">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="aggregator">10430</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>London Review of Education</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">1474-8460</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub"/>
<publisher>
        <publisher-name>IOE Press</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
</journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18546/LRE.16.1.06</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="sici">1474-8460(20180327)16:1L.56;1-</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">s6.phd</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="other">/ioep/clre/2018/00000016/00000001/art00006</article-id>
<article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Articles - The EdD at 20: Lessons learned from professional doctorates</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
<title-group>
        <article-title>Being written: Thinking the normative in the EdD</article-title>
      </title-group>
<contrib-group>
        <contrib xlink:type="simple">
          <name>
<surname>Chua</surname>
<given-names>S. M. J.</given-names>
</name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
<pub-date pub-type="created">
        <day>27</day>
        <month>03</month>
        <year>2018</year>
      </pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>56</fpage>
<lpage>62</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-year>2018</copyright-year>
</permissions>
<self-uri content-type="journal_page" xlink:href="www.uclpress.co.uk/pages/london-review-of-education"/>
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      <abstract>
        <p>In this paper, I give various reasons why the doctorate in education (EdD) programme helpfully heightens our normative senses. The writing of a thesis in time, and hence the realization that the same time – that window of opportunity – to do other things and enjoy other
 experiences is traded off, comports the student in a manner that heightens his or her sense of his or her own temporality and invites reflexive consideration of what it is that truly matters. Thus, embarking on a graduate programme and writing an EdD is an invitation to theorize, no doubt
 – we are invited to read, think, reason, discuss and write down our thoughts. But at the end of the day, it is the EdD that writes us. Amid our scholarly striving, it shapes us and graces us with the keen sense of what it is that ultimately matters. Such a grasp of what truly matters
 ought then to inform our own reform of our scholarly and professional discourses in our field.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>DOCTORATE</kwd>
        <kwd>TEMPORALITY</kwd>
        <kwd>ETHICS</kwd>
        <kwd>HEIDEGGER</kwd>
        <kwd>FINNIS</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
</article>
