Research article

Brushed under the carpet: Examining the complexities of participatory research

Authors
  • Caroline Lenette
  • Nelli Stavropoulou
  • Caitlin Nunn
  • Sui Ting Kong
  • Tina Cook
  • Kate Coddington
  • Sarah Banks

Abstract

Participatory research is sometimes difficult and risky, but there is a paucity of opportunities – and some reluctance – to reflect on its challenging aspects. In this article, we present subjective accounts of our everyday experiences of conducting participatory research as women researchers. We focus on four themes from our combined research experiences to explore some of the frustrations we encounter in participatory research. We argue that it is crucial to identify, reflect upon and address such aspects in academic outputs to broaden debates and scholarly discussions. We offer these reflections, and related strategies, as a contribution to critical debates on participatory research practice.

Keywords: GENDERED FIELDWORK, CO-RESEARCH, REFLEXIVITY, NEGOTIATING ROLES, PRACTICE FRAMEWORKS, POWER DIFFERENTIALS

How to Cite:

Lenette, C., Stavropoulou, N., Nunn, C., Kong, S., Cook, T., Coddington, K. & Banks, S., (2019) “Brushed under the carpet: Examining the complexities of participatory research”, Research for All 3(2), 161–179. doi: https://doi.org/10.18546/RFA.03.2.04

Rights: Copyright © The Author(s)

1654 Views

1148 Downloads

33Citations

Published on
12 Sep 2019
Peer Reviewed